Model Performance
Gemma 4 26B MoE: How to Get 31B-Level Performance at 4B Inference Cost on a Single A100
How Google's highly efficient "Active 4B" MoE architecture delivers near-flagship reasoning at a fraction of the compute cost.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Regular Item
Selected Item
Last Updated
August 30, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • High Efficiency Architecture: The model houses 25.2 billion parameters but selectively activates only 3.8 billion per token, delivering the reasoning power of a 26B model at the inference speed and cost of a 4B model.
  • Near-Flagship Performance: It trails the much heavier 31B dense model by just 1% to 5% on core reasoning, math, and coding benchmarks, offering massive compute savings with minimal quality drop-off.
  • Single-GPU Deployment: It runs comfortably at full precision on a single 80GB GPU (like an A100 or H100) and can fit on consumer hardware with 15–20GB VRAM when quantised.
  • Massive Context: Supports an expansive 256K-token context window, making it highly effective for deep document analysis and complex RAG pipelines.
  • Advanced Capabilities: Features native vision processing for interleaved text and images, native function-calling for agentic workflows, and a configurable "thinking mode" for step-by-step logic.

Google DeepMind’s Gemma 4 family has solved a major hurdle in open-weight AI: delivering a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model small enough to run on a single high-end GPU, yet powerful enough to rival its 31B dense counterpart. For production workloads, this means near-flagship performance at a fraction of the compute cost.

The standout model is the Gemma 4 26B A4B. While it houses 25.2 billion total parameters, its MoE architecture activates only 3.8 billion parameters per token. This breakdown explores the architecture, official benchmark comparisons, and deployment costs based on Google's official model card, developer documentation, and vLLM deployment guidelines

Quick Facts: Gemma 4 26B MoE

This table is optimised for quick answers and AI engine parsing:

Feature

Specification

Model Name

Gemma 4 26B A4B (Mixture-of-Experts)

Developer

Google DeepMind

Total Parameters

25.2 Billion

Active Parameters per Token

3.8 Billion (~15% of total)

Release Date

April 2, 2026

License

Apache 2.0

Context Window

256K Tokens

Modalities Supported

Text and Image (Input), Text (Output)

Performance vs. 31B Dense

Within 1–5% on reasoning and coding benchmarks

Hardware Requirement (vLLM)

1x 80GB GPU (e.g., NVIDIA A100 or H100) for full BF16 precision

What Is Google DeepMind’s Gemma 4?

Released on April 2, 2026, Gemma 4 is Google DeepMind's latest generation of open-weight AI models. Built directly on the research foundation of Google’s proprietary Gemini 3 flagship family, Gemma 4 brings enterprise-grade architectural innovations downstream to the open-source community.

The Gemma lineage has seen massive adoption since its debut in February 2024, boasting over 400 million downloads and spawning more than 100,000 community fine-tunes within the "Gemmaverse."

A major shift for the Gemma 4 release is its licensing. The entire model family is licensed under Apache 2.0, offering significantly more permissive commercial use terms compared to the source-available licenses of Gemma 3 and earlier iterations.

The Gemma 4 Model Family Specifications

According to Google’s official model card, the Gemma 4 lineup is divided into five distinct sizes designed for specific hardware targets:

Model

Parameter Count

Architecture

Context Window

Target Hardware

E2B

2.3B effective (5.1B w/ embeddings)

Dense

128K

Phones, edge devices

E4B

4.5B effective (8B w/ embeddings)

Dense

128K

Laptops, edge devices

12B Unified

11.95B

Dense, encoder-free

256K

Consumer GPUs

26B A4B

25.2B total / 3.8B active

Mixture-of-Experts

256K

Single high-end GPU (e.g., A100)

31B

30.7B

Dense

256K

Workstations, single 80GB GPU

Deployment Insight: By activating only 3.8B parameters per token, the 26B A4B MoE delivers inference speeds typical of smaller models while preserving the reasoning capabilities of the much heavier 31B dense model. This makes it highly cost-effective for scalable cloud deployment on single-GPU instances. 

Meet the 26B A4B: Gemma's First Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) Model

The 26B A4B marks a major milestone as the first Mixture-of-Experts model in the Gemma family, as detailed in Google's official model card. The naming convention directly highlights its structural advantage: "26B" represents the total parameter count, while "A4B" stands for "Active 4B", indicating the actual number of parameters used during a single forward pass.

Official Architecture Specifications

Based on Google's model card, here are the core technical specifications optimised for quick reference:

Specification

Value

Total Parameters

25.2B

Active Parameters

3.8B

Layers

30

Sliding Window

1,024 tokens

Context Length

256K tokens

Vocabulary Size

262K

Expert Count

8 active / 128 total (plus 1 shared expert)

Supported Modalities

Text, Image

Vision Encoder

~550M parameters

How Gemma's MoE Routing Works

In a standard dense model, every parameter computes every token. In a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture, a routing mechanism selects a targeted subset of "expert" sub-networks for each token, allowing the remaining parameters to remain idle.

For the Gemma 4 26B A4B, this routing works as follows:

  • Total Capacity: The model houses 128 total experts.
  • Active Routing: For any given token, the router selects 8 active experts, alongside 1 shared expert that fires on every pass.
  • Computational Efficiency: Because of this selective routing, only 3.8 billion parameters perform computation per token.

However, deploying this model still requires enough VRAM to hold the entire architecture. The full 25.2 billion parameters must remain loaded in GPU memory to facilitate instantaneous routing and fast inference.

The Core Value Proposition

According to Google's official developer documentation, the practical benefit of this architecture is clear:

"By only activating a 4B subset of parameters during inference, the Mixture-of-Experts model runs much faster than its 26B total might suggest. This makes it an excellent choice for fast inference compared to the dense 31B model since it runs almost as fast as a 4B-parameter model."

Ultimately, the Gemma 4 26B A4B delivers a best-of-both-worlds scenario for AI deployment: the memory footprint and reasoning power of a 26B model, with the inference speed and compute efficiency of a 4B model.

The Shared Architecture Backbone of Gemma 4

Despite the differences in parameter activation, both the Gemma 4 26B A4B (Mixture-of-Experts) and the 31B (Dense) models are built on the same foundational architecture. According to Google’s official documentation, this shared backbone includes:

  • Hybrid Attention Mechanism: This architecture interleaves local sliding-window attention with full global attention, ensuring the final layer is always set to global. It delivers the speed and low memory footprint characteristic of lightweight models while maintaining the long-context awareness required for complex tasks.
  • Unified Keys and Values: Applied on global attention layers to aggressively optimise memory usage during long-context processing.
  • Proportional RoPE (p-RoPE): Implemented on global attention layers to enhance positional encoding.
  • Native System Prompt Support: Unlike previous generations, Gemma 4 introduces structural, native support for a distinct system role.
  • Configurable Thinking Mode: Developers can trigger step-by-step reasoning by placing a <|think|> control token at the start of the system prompt, allowing the model to process logic before generating a final answer.

Benchmark Performance: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs. 31B Dense

The claim of achieving "31B-level performance at 4B inference cost" is heavily supported by Google's officially published benchmark data. The table below compares the 26B A4B MoE model against the flagship 31B dense model, with the previous-generation Gemma 3 27B included to highlight the generational leap. 

Benchmark

Gemma 4 31B (Dense)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (MoE)

Gap

Gemma 3 27B (Prior Gen)

MMLU Pro

85.2%

82.6%

-2.6 pts

67.6%

AIME 2026 (No tools)

89.2%

88.3%

-0.9 pts

20.8%

LiveCodeBench v6

80.0%

77.1%

-2.9 pts

29.1%

Codeforces ELO

2150

1718

-432 pts

110

GPQA Diamond

84.3%

82.3%

-2.0 pts

42.4%

Tau2 (Avg of 3)

76.9%

68.2%

-8.7 pts

16.2%

BigBench Extra Hard

74.4%

64.8%

-9.6 pts

19.3%

MMMLU (Multilingual)

88.4%

86.3%

-2.1 pts

70.7%

MMMU Pro (Vision)

76.9%

73.8%

-3.1 pts

49.7%

MATH-Vision

85.6%

82.4%

-3.2 pts

46.0%

MedXPertQA MM

61.3%

58.1%

-3.2 pts

Not tested

HLE (No tools)

19.5%

8.7%

-10.8 pts

Not tested

HLE (With search)

26.5%

17.2%

-9.3 pts

Not tested

MRCR v2 8-needle 128K

66.4%

44.1%

-22.3 pts

13.5%

Key Takeaways from the Benchmarks

  • Near-Parity on Core Reasoning: On major reasoning, math, and multilingual benchmarks (MMLU Pro, GPQA Diamond, MMMLU), the 26B A4B trails the dense 31B model by only 2 to 3 percentage points. Given that it activates roughly one-eighth the parameters per token, this is an exceptionally narrow gap. On AIME 2026, the gap is less than a single point (88.3% vs. 89.2%). (all figures per Google's official Gemma 4 model card)
  • Massive Generational Leap: Both Gemma 4 models absolutely crush the previous Gemma 3 27B model across the board, jumping by 40–60 percentage points on complex reasoning tasks like AIME and Codeforces, per the same benchmark table.
  • Where Dense Models Still Dominate: The 31B dense model proves its worth on extreme edge cases. The performance gap widens significantly on Tau2 (-8.7 pts), BigBench Extra Hard (-9.6 pts), Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) (-9 to -11 pts), and extreme long-context recall on MRCR v2 (-22.3 pts). For workloads requiring maximum long-context retention or pushing the absolute limits of AI reasoning, the 31B dense architecture remains necessary.

Vision and Document Understanding

The 26B A4B MoE model also maintains a highly competitive edge in multimodal tasks like document parsing.

Benchmark

Gemma 4 31B (Dense)

Gemma 4 26B A4B (MoE)

OmniDocBench 1.5(Avg edit distance, lower is better)

0.131

0.149

On OmniDocBench 1.5, the MoE model shows only a minor 0.018 difference in average edit distance compared to the 31B model, and both heavily outperform Gemma 3 27B (which scored a distant 0.365).

Hardware Requirements: Running the 26B A4B on a Single A100

The practical advantage of the "Active 4B" architecture becomes apparent in deployment. Based on official vLLM recipes and ecosystem documentation, here is exactly what it takes to run the Gemma 4 26B A4B in production. 

Full-Precision (BF16) Deployment

According to vLLM’s official Gemma 4 usage recipe, which supported the model on launch day, deploying the 26B A4B (and the 31B Dense) at full BF16 precision requires a minimum of one 80GB GPU, such as an NVIDIA A100 80GB or H100 80GB.

  • No Tensor Parallelism Needed: For single-GPU deployments, you do not need to split the model across cards as long as the 80GB VRAM accommodates the full 25.2B parameters.
  • High Concurrency: Because only ~3.8B parameters activate per token, routing overhead is negligible. A single 80GB GPU can comfortably handle 30+ concurrent requests without severe batching degradation.
  • When to Scale: Multi-GPU setups using tensor parallelism (e.g., --tensor-parallel-size 2) are only strictly necessary if you intend to push the context window far beyond what a single card's memory can hold.

Quantised Deployment (Consumer & Prosumer Hardware)

For developers lacking 80GB enterprise cards, Google and the open-source community provide quantised checkpoints that dramatically reduce memory requirements. Google specifically released Q4_0 QAT (Quantization-Aware Training) checkpoints for the Gemma 4 family, available on Hugging Face in GGUF format for llama.cpp and compressed-tensors format for vLLM, maintaining high reasoning quality while shrinking the footprint. 

Quantization Format

Approximate VRAM

Practical Hardware Target

BF16 (Full Precision)

~50GB+

1x 80GB GPU (A100 / H100)

Q8_0

~27–28GB

RTX 4090 (24GB, very tight) or RTX 5090 (32GB)

Q4_K_M(Recommended)

~15.4–20.8GB

RTX 4090 / 3090 (24GB), Mac w/ 24GB+ Unified Memory

AWQ 4-bit

~15GB

RTX 3090 / 4090 class GPUs

Throughput Advantage

Independent benchmarks using official runtimes highlight the massive speed advantage of the MoE design over standard dense models.

  • Generation Speed: On a consumer RTX 3090, the 26B A4B pushes roughly 64–119 tokens/sec, as reported across several independent hardware benchmarks. By comparison, the 31B dense model on the same hardware manages only 30–34 tokens/sec.
  • Prompt Processing (Prefill): At a 128K context length, community testing shows the model can process well over 1,000 tokens/sec on the same card. This rapid ingestion is a critical advantage for RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipelines and agentic workflows that rely on massive document context.

Official Sampling & Deployment Configuration

Google’s model card outlines specific configurations to achieve optimal results in production:

Recommended Sampling Parameters

Standard baseline settings for general use cases:

  • Temperature: 1.0
  • Top-P: 0.95
  • Top-K: 64

Configuring "Thinking Mode"

Gemma 4 natively supports step-by-step reasoning logic before committing to an answer:

  1. Activation: Inject the <|think|> token at the very beginning of the system prompt.
  2. Output Structure: The model will stream its internal logic inside a structured <|channel>thought...channel|> block, followed by the final answer.
  3. Multi-turn hygiene: For ongoing chat sessions, strip out historical thought blocks before passing the conversation history back to the model. Only the final answers should persist in the history.

Multimodal Input Formatting

  • Ordering: Always place image tokens before text tokens in your prompts.
  • Dynamic Vision Budgets: The model supports dynamic token allocations per image to optimise for task complexity (70, 140, 280, 560, or 1,120 tokens). Use lower budgets for simple captioning or classification, and higher budgets for dense document parsing and OCR.

Core Capabilities of the 26B A4B

According to Google’s official documentation, the Gemma 4 26B A4B MoE supports:

  • Advanced Reasoning: Accessible via the dedicated, configurable thinking mode.
  • Massive Context: A full 256K-token sliding-window context length.
  • Vision & Image Understanding: Multilingual OCR, handwriting recognition, chart parsing, spatial pointing, and dense document comprehension.
  • Interleaved Modality: Seamlessly mixing text and images in any order within a single prompt.
  • Agentic Function Calling: Native, structured tool-use support for complex workflows.
  • Coding & Engineering: High-tier generation, code completion, and autonomous correction.
  • Broad Multilingualism: Pre-trained on over 140 languages and optimised out-of-the-box for 35+.

Note on Audio Modality: Unlike the smaller E2B, E4B, and 12B Unified variants, the 26B A4B MoE does not support audio input natively. If audio transcription or processing is required, you must use the smaller/mid-sized dense models.

Training Data and Safety Standards

According to Google's official Gemma 4 model card, Gemma 4 models were trained under strict data safety and governance protocols:

  • Training Cutoff Date: The pre-training dataset has a cutoff date of January 2025.
     
  • Dataset Composition: The pre-training dataset is a large-scale, diverse collection of data encompassing a wide range of domains and modalities, including web documents, code, images, and audio, with the training dataset including content in over 140 languages. 
  • CSAM & Sensitive Data Filtering: Rigorous CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) filtering was applied at multiple stages of the data preparation process to exclude harmful and illegal content, and automated techniques were used to filter out certain personal information and other sensitive data from training sets. 
  • Safety Alignment: Developed by Google DeepMind, Gemma 4 undergoes the same rigorous safety evaluations as Google's proprietary Gemini models, with a range of automated and human evaluations conducted in partnership with internal safety and responsible AI teams. For all areas of safety testing, major improvements were seen across all categories of content safety relative to previous Gemma models, with Gemma 4 significantly outperforming Gemma 3 and 3n models on safety while keeping unjustified refusals low.

Decision Matrix: Gemma 4 26B A4B (MoE) vs. 31B (Dense)

Choosing between the 26B A4B MoE model and the 31B Dense flagship depends on your specific infrastructure constraints and accuracy requirements:

Decision Factor

Choose 26B A4B (MoE) if...

Choose 31B (Dense) if...

Primary Goal

Maximising inference speed & cost per token

Achieving peak benchmark accuracy regardless of cost

GPU Hardware

Deploying on a single 80GB card (A100/H100) or consumer hardware

Running multi-GPU clusters with continuous 80GB VRAM headroom

Concurrency

Serving high concurrent traffic with low batching latency

Serving batch workloads where speed is secondary to precision

Workload Type

General chatbots, coding assistants, agentic tool-use, standard RAG

Extreme long-context needle retrieval (MRCR) or open-ended research

Accuracy Gap

A ~2–3% benchmark variance from the flagship is acceptable

Pushing absolute top-tier performance (e.g., Humanity's Last Exam tasks)

Production Recommendation: For the vast majority of real-world deployments, including enterprise chatbots, RAG pipelines, and automated coding assistants, the Gemma 4 26B A4B offers a sweet spot. The massive inference speed gains and concurrency advantages easily outweigh the minor 2–3% benchmark trade-off.

Ecosystem Integration & Availability

The Gemma 4 26B A4B is available across all major open-source frameworks and cloud platforms:

  • Inference Engines & Local Runtime:
    • vLLM: Native support integrated on launch day (v0.19.0+) with optimised single-GPU and tensor-parallel deployment recipes.
    • Local Frameworks: Native integrations available for Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp, and MLX.

  • Cloud & Managed Hosting:
    • Google Cloud Platform: One-click deployment via Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE), Cloud Run, and Vertex AI.
    • Managed APIs: Accessible directly through the Gemini API infrastructure for teams preferring a fully managed serverless option.
    • Kaggle: Fully accessible within the official Gemma 4 model collection.

Summary

The Gemma 4 26B A4B solves a fundamental bottleneck in modern LLM deployment: delivering near-flagship intelligence without requiring flagship compute budgets.

By activating just 4 billion parameters per token during generation, while all 26 billion total parameters must be loaded into memory to maintain fast routing and inference speeds, Google DeepMind has delivered an MoE architecture that lands within 2–3 percentage points of the 31B dense model on core reasoning and coding benchmarks, while fitting comfortably on a single 80GB GPU, drastically cutting token generation costs, and running at speeds comparable to a lightweight 4B model.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the Gemma 4 26B A4B?

It is an open-weight Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) AI model from Google DeepMind, released on April 2, 2026. The name means it has about 26 billion total parameters, but only a 4-billion subset is active at any given time.

How does the "Mixture-of-Experts" routing work?

The model contains 128 "expert" sub-networks. For every token it processes, a router selects just 8 active experts (plus 1 shared expert). This means only 3.8 billion parameters do the computational work per token, while the rest stay idle.

What is the main benefit of this design?

You get the massive reasoning power and knowledge capacity of a 26-billion-parameter model, but it runs with the inference speed and cheaper computing cost of a much smaller 4-billion-parameter model.

How does its performance compare to the bigger 31B Dense model?

It is incredibly close. On most reasoning, math, and coding benchmarks, the 26B MoE model trails the heavier 31B model by only 1 to 5 percentage points.

When does the heavier 31B Dense model perform better?

The 31B model pulls ahead significantly on extreme edge cases, like maximum long-context recall tasks (finding a needle in a massive document) or the absolute hardest open-ended research benchmarks.

What types of input does it support?

It supports both text and image inputs (and outputs text). You can mix text and images in any order. However, the 26B A4B model does not natively support audio inputs.

What is "Thinking Mode"?

You can force the model to reason step-by-step before answering by putting a <|think|> token at the start of your system prompt. It will output its internal logic in a structured block before giving you the final answer.

What kind of hardware do I need to run it?

To run the model at full precision (BF16), you need a single 80GB GPU, like an NVIDIA A100 or H100. Because it is computationally highly efficient, one card can handle over 30 concurrent requests easily.

Can I run it on consumer graphics cards?

Yes. If you use a quantised version (like Q4_K_M or AWQ 4-bit), you can shrink the memory footprint down to about 13–20GB. This allows it to run comfortably on an RTX 3090, RTX 4090, or an Apple Silicon Mac with 24GB or more of Unified Memory. Keep in mind that MoE saves compute, not memory; you still need enough RAM to load all 26 billion parameters.

What license is it released under?

The entire Gemma 4 family is licensed under Apache 2.0, making it very permissive for commercial use.

Ready to deploy Gemma 4 in production?
Running open-weight MoE models efficiently requires infrastructure that can scale dynamically while keeping latency and compute costs in check.
Scale and serve Gemma 4 with Simplismart, the enterprise-grade inference platform that lets you deploy, optimise, and manage generative AI models seamlessly in your cloud or on-prem environment. Get sub-second cold starts, dynamic autoscaling, and tailor-made inference optimised for your strict SLAs.

Find out what is tailor-made inference for you.